From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:01:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:01:09 -0400 Received: from imladris.infradead.org ([194.205.184.45]:61202 "EHLO infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:00:58 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 21:59:55 +0100 (BST) From: Riley Williams X-X-Sender: To: Ion Badulescu cc: Shawn Starr , , Alan Cox Subject: Re: Gigabit Intel NIC? - Intel Gigabit Ethernet Pro/1000T In-Reply-To: <200106131025.f5DAPMF01441@moisil.badula.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Ion. >> Shawn, I'd suggest you tell the said sales guy that IF he can >> get you the FULL specs TOGETHER WITH permission to freely >> distribute them... > Permission to freely distribute the specs isn't necessary, > although it is nice indeed. All that's needed is permission to > GPL the driver sources written using knowledge from said specs. That presupposes that the person they give the specs to is the person writing the driver. I don't remember shawn offering to write a driver or anything approaching that. As I see it, if Shawn has permission to freely distribute the specs, he can send a copy to Alan Cox for forwarding to the relevant driver developers. However, if he has to sign an NDA to get them, they're useless... Alan: Am I right in assuming this? Best wishes from Riley.