From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 20:28:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 20:28:27 -0400 Received: from mail2.rdc2.bc.home.com ([24.2.10.85]:4854 "EHLO mail2.rdc2.bc.home.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 20:28:13 -0400 Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 17:25:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Daniel Bertrand X-X-Sender: To: Robert Love cc: Dylan Griffiths , emu10k1-devel , Linux kernel Subject: Re: [Emu10k1-devel] Re: Buggy emu10k1 drivers. In-Reply-To: <992822448.3798.6.camel@phantasy> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 17 Jun 2001, Robert Love wrote: > On 17 Jun 2001 15:17:41 -0700, Daniel Bertrand wrote: > > Can you give the CVS driver a try? Snapshots are available here: > > http://opensource.creative.com/snapshot.html > > > > The driver in the kernel is based on a CVS snapshot from last summer, the > > problem may be fixed in CVS. Also, the CVS driver is a common driver for > > 2.2 and 2.4 (with some #ifdef), so it may be useful to see if it works for > > you on 2.4.5 but not on 2.2.19. > > if the driver in the kernel is that old, could we try merging a newer > release? is there any reason why it has not been done yet? A patch was submitted to Alan in April but appears to have never made it in, I'm not sure what his reason was. -- Daniel Bertrand