linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dean gaudet <dean-list-linux-kernel@arctic.org>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromi@cyberspace.org>
Cc: Jan Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Client receives TCP packets but does not ACK
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:46:58 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106181922230.5361-100000@twinlark.arctic.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a05101001b75435c7291d@[192.168.239.105]>

On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Jonathan Morton wrote:

> >  > >  > Btw: can the aplication somehow ask the tcp/ip stack what was
> >>  >actualy acked?
> >>  >>  (ie. how many bytes were acked).
> >>  >
> >>  >no, but it's not necessarily a useful number anyhow -- because it's
> >>  >possible that the remote end ACKd bytes but the ACK never arrives.  so you
> >>  >can get into a situation where the remote application has the entire
> >>  >message but the local application doesn't know.  the only way to solve
> >>  >this is above the TCP layer.  (message duplicate elimination using an
> >>  >unique id.)
> >>
> >>  No, because if the ACK doesn't reach the sending machine, the sender
> >>  will retry the data until it does get an ACK.
> >
> >if the network goes down in between, the sender may never get the ACK.
> >the sender will see a timeout eventually.  the receiver may already be
> >done with the connection and closed it and never see the error.  if it
> >were a protocol such as SMTP then the sender would retry later, and the
> >result would be a duplicate message.  (which you can eliminate above the
> >TCP layer using unique ids.)
>
> But, if the sender does not attempt to close the socket until the ACK
> returns, then the receiver will see an unfinished connection and
> (hopefully) realise that the message is unsafe and not attempt to
> send it.

suppose the network goes away and doesn't come back.  the ACK never gets
through.

> With SMTP, the last piece of data is a QUIT anyway, which occurs
> after the end-of-message marker - once the QUIT is sent and/or
> received, both ends know that the connection is finished with and
> will close the socket independently of each other.  If the network
> disappears before the QUIT comes along, the receiver should be
> discarding messages and the sender retrying later.

QUIT is the last step of a session which can include multiple messages. a
single message begins with the "MAIL FROM:<foo>" and ends with the . that
terminates the DATA section.  after that the smtp server sends back the
"250 OK".  the smtp client is now free to sit on the connection "forever",
possibly beginning another "MAIL FROM:<foo>".  (i.e. connection caching in
sendmail.)

but in the meanwhile, the smtp server has moved the message into its next
phase of delivery as soon as it sends back the "250 OK", which could
include having forwarded it off the box, or to a mailing list, etc.

so in this example where you want to consider network failure is after the
smtp client has sent the trailing "." closing the DATA section, and that
data has been received by the smtp server.  then the network fails before
the ACK (and "250 OK") returns to the smtp client.

in this case the client has no choice but to resend later.  (both sides
should get an error eventually assuming the implementors don't suck,
unlike in some other protocols such as HTTP/0.9 and HTTP/1.0 where the
protocol itself is flawed.)  the result is probably a message duplicate.

so what you were asking about was, what if the smtp server in this case
could find out that the "250 OK" was never ACKd.  in that case just move
the network failure a little later in the series of events... and also
consider cases where the TCP stack ACKs but the application never gets to
read() the data (system failures).

basically these transactional semantics have to occur above TCP/IP itself.
this is where QUIT comes in.  and to some extent, message-IDs for
duplicate elimination.  (in HTTP/1.1 the introduction of chunked transfer
encoding to handle variable length dynamic responses in the face of
network failures... but folks building web forms still need to put
unique-ids into the forms to handle the duplicate message problem.)

i guess knowing the number of ACK'd bytes might be a useful debugging aid,
but i'd fear it being misused by app writers.

-dean


  reply	other threads:[~2001-06-19  2:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-06-15 12:53 Heusden, Folkert van
2001-06-15 18:27 ` Mike Black
2001-06-15 18:39   ` Gérard Roudier
2001-06-15 19:12   ` Alan Cox
2001-06-17 18:17     ` Pavel Machek
2001-06-17 19:32       ` Alan Cox
2001-06-17 19:40       ` Dan Podeanu
     [not found]         ` <200106172113.f5HLDhJ377473@saturn.cs.uml.edu>
2001-06-17 22:09           ` Dan Podeanu
2001-06-17 22:35         ` dean gaudet
2001-06-18 11:50 ` Jan Hudec
2001-06-18 16:17   ` dean gaudet
2001-06-18 16:48     ` Jonathan Morton
2001-06-18 22:30       ` dean gaudet
2001-06-18 23:43         ` Jonathan Morton
2001-06-19  2:46           ` dean gaudet [this message]
2001-06-20 21:01   ` David Schwartz
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-01 21:27 Nivedita Singhvi
2001-07-11  3:43 ` Robert Kleemann
     [not found] <E15BiHy-0002xC-00@the-village.bc.nu.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2001-06-17 20:21 ` Andi Kleen
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106121720310.1152-100000@localhost.localdomain.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2001-06-13  8:48 ` Andi Kleen
2001-06-13 16:09   ` Robert Kleemann
2001-06-13  0:26 Robert Kleemann
2001-06-15  3:50 ` Robert Kleemann
2001-06-15 12:44   ` Mike Black
2001-06-15 18:29     ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-06-15 23:10       ` Robert Kleemann
2001-06-16 11:55       ` Mike Black
2001-06-16 23:56 ` Robert Kleemann
2001-06-27  1:04   ` Robert Kleemann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.33.0106181922230.5361-100000@twinlark.arctic.org \
    --to=dean-list-linux-kernel@arctic.org \
    --cc=bulb@ucw.cz \
    --cc=chromi@cyberspace.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: Client receives TCP packets but does not ACK' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).