From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:33:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:33:20 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:6662 "HELO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:33:10 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:32:55 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Daniel Phillips Cc: Pavel Machek , Linux-Kernel Subject: Re: spindown In-Reply-To: <01062018523007.00439@starship> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote: > BTW, with nominal 100,000 erases you have to write 10 terabytes > to your 100 meg flash disk before you'll see it start to > degrade. That assumes you write out full blocks. If you flush after every byte written you'll hit the limit a lot sooner ;) Btw, this is also a problem with your patch, when you write out buffers all the time your disk will spend more time seeking all over the place (moving the disk head away from where we are currently reading!) and you'll end up writing the same block multiple times ... regards, Rik -- Executive summary of a recent Microsoft press release: "we are concerned about the GNU General Public License (GPL)" http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/