From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 15:19:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 15:19:48 -0400 Received: from adsl-64-175-255-50.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net ([64.175.255.50]:64899 "HELO kobayashi.soze.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 15:19:31 -0400 Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 12:23:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Justin Guyett X-X-Sender: To: Chris Wedgwood Cc: Alan Cox , "Jeff V. Merkey" , , Subject: Re: NWFS Submitted to Alan Cox In-Reply-To: <20010702025418.B14068@weta.f00f.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 01:50:00PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > > I'm not a file sustem hacker, nor since I work for one vendor the > > appropriate owner for larg chunks of code in some people's eyes. I > > suspect the FSF is a much much better asignee for the code itself > > I assume the legal threats that Jeff has experience will follow the > code? Surely before anyone wishes to adopt such a thing they should > get legal advice about the situation? > > It would be shame to let potentially useful code be left to die for > fear of bully-tactics if their claims are unfounded. presuming they are unfounded, given the history of attacks by Novell, perhaps the best move would be to turn it over to a company like compaq or ibm given a written contract that they will keep it open source. Novell can't be that stupid. justin