From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 22:58:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 22:58:39 -0400 Received: from warden.digitalinsight.com ([208.29.163.2]:38084 "HELO warden.diginsite.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 22:58:31 -0400 From: David Lang To: Daniel Phillips Cc: John Ripley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, VDA Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 19:58:27 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: COW fs (Re: Editing-in-place of a large file) In-Reply-To: <20010910023641Z16066-26183+701@humbolt.nl.linux.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org if sectors full of zeros are really that common then they should never be swapped out, just a new page allocated and zeroed when it would be swapped back in. Even better then combining all of them into one block on disk. David Lang On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote: > Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 04:43:53 +0200 > From: Daniel Phillips > To: John Ripley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: VDA > Subject: Re: COW fs (Re: Editing-in-place of a large file) > > On September 9, 2001 06:30 pm, John Ripley wrote: > > Interesting results for the swap partitions. Probably full of zeros. > > It doesn't make a lot of sense to spend 30-35% of your swap bandwidth > swapping zeros in and out, does it? > > -- > Daniel > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >