From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 14:28:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 14:28:26 -0400 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:57872 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Sep 2001 14:28:25 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 11:27:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Alexander Viro cc: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.10-pre11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Alexander Viro wrote: > > It can be modified so that combination with lazy-bdev and pipefs-like tree > would work. And yes, most of the ugliness would just go away. That's the part I like about the page-cache bdev patch. It has a lot of fairly ugly warts, but all of them seem to be really fixable with _other_ cleanups, at which point only the good parts remain. I agree that the timing may leave something to be desired. But we had the discussion about fixing pagecache-bdev consistency wrt the regular buffer cache filesystem accesses a week or so ago, and the fact is that nobody really seems to have started working on it - because everybody felt that you have to get everything done at once. I don't have that feeling. I'm happy with having partial merge with ugly warts, if it means that you can get to the final stage _without_ having to have all the problems fixed at one time. So now we have two _smaller_ merges that will fix two other issues, and remove all the horridness from the original merge. Linus