From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 16:51:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 16:51:45 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:61706 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 16:51:30 -0500 Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 13:49:05 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: cc: Andi Kleen , Paul Mackerras , Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 10.31 second kernel compile In-Reply-To: <20020316143916.A23204@hq.fsmlabs.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by deepthought.transmeta.com id g2GLncN29178 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 16 Mar 2002 yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote: > > If you want to optimize for gnome, you get a very different > layout. But Hammer and ia64 are supposedly designed for huge > databases, routing tables, and images. Yeah, and I'm claiming that databases etc count for a whole lot less than most other apps. > What's the "common case" for 64 bit ? Do you really think it will > be on desktop soon? Oh, not Itanium for sure. But if AMD succeeds even reasonably with Hammer, Intel will certainly see the error of its ways (except they won't admit it) and make their version of a 64-bit P4 core available. They're reportedly working on it already, just in case the Itanic sinks (and judging by current market behaviour it certainly isn't flying). > > In short, youäre > > Don't use umlauts unless you are ready to back it up. That's not an umlaut, that's an "ä", which is a real letter in Finnish and Swedish (it just _looks_ like an a with an umlaut to you uncultured people), and it happens to be a letter that is just left of the ' mark on a Finnish keyboard. Linus