From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 20:19:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 20:19:33 -0500 Received: from air-2.osdl.org ([65.201.151.6]:24585 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 16 Mar 2002 20:19:17 -0500 Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 17:17:30 -0800 (PST) From: X-X-Sender: To: cc: Alan Cox , Linus Torvalds , Andi Kleen , Paul Mackerras , Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 10.31 second kernel compile In-Reply-To: <20020316161057.A23495@hq.fsmlabs.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 16 Mar 2002 yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote: | On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 10:00:07PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: | > > databases, routing tables, and images. Our good friends at Intel | > > claim "carrier grade" Linux needs to run threaded apps | > > with 10,000 threads to depose Solaris in telecom - all sharing the | > > same monster address space.=20 | > | > Thats intel though. The same people who seem to think that hyperthreading | > in the CPU is required for carrier grade work 8) | | I love the whole sound of "carrier grade" though: Do you use "carrier grade" | Linux or just the "recreational boating" version? Don't know what Intel is claiming, but OSDL is sponsoring a "Carrier Grade Linux Working Group". See info at www.osdl.org and/or at cglinux.sf.net . -- ~Randy