From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:42:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:42:04 -0400 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:8204 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:42:02 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 13:46:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Andrew Morton cc: Alan Cox , Daniel Phillips , "Martin J. Bligh" , Oliver Neukum , Rob Landley , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not3.0 - (NUMA)) In-Reply-To: <3DA1EF3C.65C0073F@digeo.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Andrew Morton wrote: > > The other obvious heuristic is "if the parent directory was > created in the last five seconds, use find_group_other()". But > that made Linus go "ewwww". Well, it makes me go "less ewww" than the current scheme, so if that turns out to be acceptable to others, I won't mind _too_ much. The reason I don't like time too much persoanlly is that it's not very reproducible. Especially if the times are in the second range. I'd rather have a heuristic that is deterministic. Linus