From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261934AbTANJ3s>; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 04:29:48 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S261963AbTANJ3r>; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 04:29:47 -0500
Received: from userel174.dsl.pipex.com ([62.188.199.174]:19335 "EHLO
	einstein31.homenet") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S261934AbTANJ3r>; Tue, 14 Jan 2003 04:29:47 -0500
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 09:39:42 +0000 (GMT)
From: Tigran Aivazian <tigran@veritas.com>
X-X-Sender: <tigran@einstein31.homenet>
To: <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Intel And Kenrel Programming (was: Nvidia is a great company)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301131852100.9994-100000@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0301140936460.1110-100000@einstein31.homenet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

The answer is, yes, you are right. Not because no errors were found (who
knows about that!) but because no microcode was released to me by Intel
since the one you see on website. As soon as I get new microcode it will
be uploaded immediately, don't worry.

Regards
Tigran

> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:46:08 -0500
> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
> To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: Intel And Kenrel Programming (was: Nvidia is a great company)
>
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 16:45:24 GMT, Alan Cox said:
> > One thing that has been helpful is the microcode update stuff Intel did, we
> > hit  few bugs that up to date microcode kill off
>
> http://www.urbanmyth.org/microcode/ says that microcode_ctl 1.06 is the
> latest, dated all the way back to 11 Jun 2001.  Is that in fact the most
> recent?  In this industry, I alway worry when "most recent" is 18 months
> old.
>
> Hopefully it's the most recent because no further errata have been found.;)
>
>