From: "C.Newport" <crn@netunix.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: <solca@guug.org>, <hch@infradead.org>, <zaitcev@redhat.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
<debian-sparc@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: sparc scsi esp depends on pci & hangs on boot
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 10:35:56 +0100 (BST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0307231031240.26107-100000@hek.netunix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030723012824.5d8dec9b.davem@redhat.com>
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 09:33:40 +0100 (BST)
> "C.Newport" <crn@netunix.com> wrote:
>
> > Ouch - As I mentioned a few days ago, the Ex000 range can have a
> > mixture of SBUS and PCI.
>
> So what?
>
> > This configuration is becoming increasingly
> > common as these machines are upgraded to attach to SAN stuff and
> > other FCAL variants for which there is no SBUS card.
>
> Nothing I have said prevents these systems from fully
> working.
>
> Because I won't move SBUS over to generic struct device,
> none of the SBUS device drivers will change either, therefore
> everything works as it does today.
>
> What's the problem?
In that case none, but your original message implied that this did
not exist and would not be supported.
Maybe I misunderstood what you meant.
OTOH, (if !SBUS) might screw up ?.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-23 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-22 2:51 sparc scsi esp depends on pci & hangs on boot Otto Solares
2003-07-22 12:09 ` Pete Zaitcev
2003-07-22 18:26 ` Otto Solares
2003-07-23 0:54 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 2:32 ` Otto Solares
2003-07-23 6:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-07-23 6:24 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 6:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-07-23 6:29 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 6:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-07-23 6:57 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 7:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-07-23 7:20 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 8:45 ` Otto Solares
2003-07-23 14:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-07-23 6:43 ` Otto Solares
2003-07-23 7:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-07-23 7:20 ` Otto Solares
2003-07-23 7:27 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 8:33 ` C.Newport
2003-07-23 8:28 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 9:35 ` C.Newport [this message]
2003-07-23 9:37 ` David S. Miller
2003-07-23 8:55 ` Otto Solares
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.33.0307231031240.26107-100000@hek.netunix.com \
--to=crn@netunix.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=debian-sparc@lists.debian.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=solca@guug.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zaitcev@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).