From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264266AbTLBBIM (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 20:08:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264273AbTLBBIM (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 20:08:12 -0500 Received: from wombat.indigo.net.au ([202.0.185.19]:53771 "EHLO wombat.indigo.net.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264266AbTLBBIJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 20:08:09 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 09:09:53 +0800 (WST) From: Ian Kent X-X-Sender: To: Christoph Hellwig cc: Marcelo Tosatti , Subject: Re: Linux 2.4 future In-Reply-To: <20031201153316.B3879@infradead.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.6, required 8, AWL, BAYES_20, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION, IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, USER_AGENT_PINE) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 11:04:21PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > Would you be willing to consider autofs4 patches that I would like > > included in 2.4? > > What autofs4 patches? bugfixes, features? if they aren't in > 2.6 yet I don't think it makes sense trying to get them into > 2.4 anymore at all. > Yep. I have just finished porting them to 2.6 and will be attempting to get the help of autofs list inhabitants for initail testing in the next few days. I have one volunteer so far. Anyone else got time, a 2.6 environment and willing to help? -- ,-._|\ Ian Kent / \ Perth, Western Australia *_.--._/ E-mail: raven@themaw.net v Web: http://themaw.net/