From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264274AbTLBBKl (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 20:10:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264275AbTLBBKk (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 20:10:40 -0500 Received: from wombat.indigo.net.au ([202.0.185.19]:55819 "EHLO wombat.indigo.net.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264274AbTLBBKj (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 20:10:39 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 09:11:50 +0800 (WST) From: Ian Kent X-X-Sender: To: Arjan van de Ven cc: "Peter C. Norton" , Christoph Hellwig , Marcelo Tosatti , Subject: Re: Linux 2.4 future In-Reply-To: <1070322894.5260.5.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.6, required 8, AWL, BAYES_20, EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION, IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, USER_AGENT_PINE) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 22:36, Peter C. Norton wrote: > ` > > encouraging the distros to get behind autofs4 (hint hint, redhat, > > hint). > > I suspect you'll have a really hard time finding ANY distro that still > wants to actively develop new products on a 2.4 codebase. > Do you feel that 2.6 will be stable enough, soon enough for us to not see another RedHat 2.4.x? -- ,-._|\ Ian Kent / \ Perth, Western Australia *_.--._/ E-mail: raven@themaw.net v Web: http://themaw.net/