From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 12:57:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 12:57:30 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:4365 "HELO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 12:57:11 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 13:57:09 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Lawrence Greenfield Cc: Subject: Re: ext3-2.4-0.9.4 In-Reply-To: <200107271624.f6RGOu8U010566@acap-dev.nas.cmu.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Lawrence Greenfield wrote: > I'm one of those icky application programmers attempting to make > reliable software across different versions of Unix. > > We need to get data to disk portably, quickly, and reliably. > > I love it when I see things like: "No, Linus is right and the MTA > guys are just wrong." > > This sort of attitude is just ridiculous. Unix had a defined set of > semantics. This might have been stupid semantics, but it had them. The stuff you people seem to insist on, however, most definately isn't part of the defined set of semantics. If you believe otherwise, feel free to point out the relevant sections in POSIX / SuS / ... regards, Rik -- Executive summary of a recent Microsoft press release: "we are concerned about the GNU General Public License (GPL)" http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/