From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 4 Aug 2001 03:13:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 4 Aug 2001 03:13:25 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:9735 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 4 Aug 2001 03:13:22 -0400 Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 04:13:26 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: Linus Torvalds , Ben LaHaise , Daniel Phillips , , Subject: Re: [RFC][DATA] re "ongoing vm suckage" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > Well, the freepages_high change needs more work. > > Normal allocations are not going to easily "fall down" to lower zones > because the high zones will be kept at freepages.high most of the time. Actually, the first allocation loop in __alloc_pages() is testing against zone->pages_high and allocating only from zones which have MORE than this. So I guess this should only result in a somewhat slower and/or softer fallback and definately worth a try. Oh, and we definately need to un-lazy the queue movement from the inactive_clean list. Having all of the pages you counted on as being reclaimable referenced is a very bad surprise ... regards, Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)