From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
To: Samium Gromoff <_deepfire@mail.ru>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: lilo vs other OS bootloaders was: FreeBSD makes progress
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 11:10:00 -0300 (BRST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0109011109220.20664-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200109011455.f81Ethw00685@vegae.deep.net>
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001, Samium Gromoff wrote:
> ANdreas Dilger wrote:
> > Win2K even abstracts all SMP/UP code into a module (the HAL) and loads this
> > at boot, thus using the same kernel for both.
> the only possibility of this shows how ugly is SMP in win2k...
Not necessarily. More likely the difference between SMP and
UP is marketing-only and both have the overhead of SMP
locking, etc..
cheers,
Rik
--
IA64: a worthy successor to i860.
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-01 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-01 14:55 lilo vs other OS bootloaders was: FreeBSD makes progress Samium Gromoff
2001-09-01 12:03 ` Peter Wächtler
2001-09-01 12:39 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-01 14:10 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-09-05 21:18 Grover, Andrew
2001-09-05 22:11 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-05 22:13 ` Tim Hockin
2001-09-04 21:52 Grover, Andrew
2001-09-05 1:51 ` David S. Miller
2001-09-05 8:03 ` Helge Hafting
2001-09-05 14:26 ` Horst von Brand
2001-09-11 22:48 ` Pavel Machek
2001-08-31 21:49 Grover, Andrew
2001-08-31 22:40 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-08-31 22:50 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-01 15:50 ` Jamie Lokier
2001-09-08 17:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-09-08 18:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.33L.0109011109220.20664-100000@imladris.rielhome.conectiva \
--to=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=_deepfire@mail.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).