From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 12:28:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 12:27:54 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:43538 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 12:27:47 -0400 Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:27:50 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Jan Harkes Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , Linus Torvalds , Daniel Phillips , lkml Subject: Re: page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue In-Reply-To: <20010904112629.A27988@cs.cmu.edu> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Jan Harkes wrote: > NO, please don't add another list to fix the symptoms of bad page aging. > > One of the graduate students here at CMU has been looking at the 2.4 VM, > trying to predict the size of the app that can possibly be loaded > without causing the system to start trashing. [snip results] > Aging is broken. Horribly. As a result, the inactive list is filled with > pages that are not necessarily inactive. I've been working on a CPU and memory efficient reverse mapping patch for Linux, one which will allow us to do a bunch of optimisations for later on (infrastructure) and has as its short-term benefit the potential for better page aging. It seems the balancing FreeBSD does (up aging +3, down aging -1, inactive list in LRU order as extra stage) is working nicely on my laptop now, but I don't think I'll be releasing that as part of the patch ... http://www.surriel.com/patches/2.4/2.4.8-ac12-pmap3 regards, Rik -- IA64: a worthy successor to i860. http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)