From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 07:18:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 07:18:39 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:7697 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 07:18:26 -0400 Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 08:18:40 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Jan Harkes , Marcelo Tosatti , Subject: Re: page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue In-Reply-To: <20010904215449.S699@athlon.random> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 01:54:27PM -0400, Jan Harkes wrote: > > Now for the past _9_ stable kernel releases, page aging hasn't worked > > at all!! Nobody seems to even have bothered to check. I send in a patch > > All I can say is that I hope you will get your problem fixed with one > of the next -aa, I incidentally started working on it yesterday. You too? ;) > So far it's a one thousand diff very far from compiling, so it will > grow further, but it shouldn't take too long to finish the rewrite. > Once finished the benchmarks and the reproducible 2.4 deadlocks will > tell me if I'm right. Of course, we could try to work together on this one, since we both seem to be starved for time ... cheers, Rik -- IA64: a worthy successor to i860. http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)