From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 15:59:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 15:59:30 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:47629 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 23 Oct 2001 15:59:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 17:59:39 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: bill davidsen Cc: Subject: Re: [Q] pivot_root and initrd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, bill davidsen wrote: > In article <9r4c24$g2k$1@cesium.transmeta.com>, > H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > | The right thing is to get rid of the old initrd compatibility cruft, > | but that's a 2.5 change. > > Get rid of??? As long as you have some equivalent capability to get > the system up. pivot_root(2) in combination with pivot_root(8) Rik -- DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/ (volunteers needed) http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/