From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 18:28:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 18:28:55 -0400 Received: from air-2.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:61614 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 18:28:53 -0400 Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 15:31:12 -0700 (PDT) From: "Randy.Dunlap" X-X-Sender: To: Russell King cc: Wim Van Sebroeck , Rob Radez , , Subject: Re: Watchdog drivers In-Reply-To: <20021013200104.C23142@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Russell King wrote: | On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 07:40:41PM +0200, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: | > I'm reviewing the different watchdog drivers and started porting the features | > that have been added in the 2.4 kernel to the 2.5 development kernel. | > I now wondered if it would make sence to put all watchdog drivers in | > drivers/char/watchdog/ instead of in drivers/char ? | > Please comments. | | Rob Radez has been doing a lot of work in this area; I thought he | was going to do the 2.5 drivers as well (or his last mail on the | 8 August seemed to imply that.) Not sure what happened. | | Rob? Rob has gone off to school and apparently has little time for such trivial stuff. :) His (2.4.19-preN) patches used to live at http://junker.org/~rradez/wd/ but I can't get to that web server now. I do have a copy of the patch file that was there if Wim or anyone needs/wants it. -- ~Randy "In general, avoiding problems is better than solving them." -- from "#ifdef Considered Harmful", Spencer & Collyer, USENIX 1992.