linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: venom@sns.it
To: rwhron@earthlink.net
Cc: piggin@cyberone.com.au, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<dmo@osdl.org>, <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] I/O regression after 2.6.0-test5
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 23:07:34 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0310212306460.4396-100000@cibs9.sns.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031021130501.GA4409@rushmore>


sql bench on mysql, una master, three slave, with old as-iosched.c
runs mutch better, thanx.


On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 rwhron@earthlink.net wrote:

> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 09:05:01 -0400
> From: rwhron@earthlink.net
> To: piggin@cyberone.com.au, venom@sns.it
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmo@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org
> Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] I/O regression after 2.6.0-test5
>
> > If you have time, would you please try testing as-iosched.c from
> > test5 in a later kernel (it won't go into test8-mm1 though).
>
> copying drivers/block/as-iosched.c from 2.6.0-test5 to test8
> looks like it fixes the regression.  Here are the results so far.
>
> In the AIM7 database benchmark, jobs/minute using test5 as-iosched.c
> doubled.  At 32 tasks, jobs/min went from 300 to 601.
> At 256 tasks, jobs/min went from 552 to 1010.
>
> test5 as-iosched.c:
> cat suite7-dbase-2.6.0-test8-as
> Benchmark       Version Machine Run Date
> AIM Multiuser Benchmark - Suite VII     "1.1"   dev4-003
>
> Tasks   Jobs/Min        Real    CPU
> 32      601.0           316.3   134.0
> 64      782.6           485.8   259.2
> 96      869.1           656.1   387.6
> 128     919.3           827.0   522.8
> 160     955.0           995.2   650.3
> 192     981.9           1161.5  790.9
> 224     1002.3          1327.5  910.2
> 256     1009.9          1505.7  1027.7
>
> Unmodififed test8.
> cat suite7-dbase-2.6.0-test8
> Benchmark       Version Machine Run Date
> AIM Multiuser Benchmark - Suite VII     "1.1"   dev4-003
>
> Tasks   Jobs/Min        Real    CPU
> 32      299.8           634.0   128.6
> 64      450.5           843.9   246.5
> 96      549.7           1037.4  366.0
> 128     558.7           1360.8  497.6
> 160     522.1           1820.2  612.2
> 192     515.5           2212.4  742.7
> 224     529.9           2510.8  859.5
> 256     552.4           2753.0  980.4
>
> The AIM7 fileserver benchmark is back up to previous
> levels when test8 uses the test5 as-iosched.c:
>
>
> test5 as-iosched.c with test8.
> cat suite7-fserver-2.6.0-test8-as
> Benchmark       Version Machine Run Date
> AIM Multiuser Benchmark - Suite VII     "1.1"   dev4-003
>
> Tasks   Jobs/Min        Real    CPU
> 4       80.5            301.0   37.0
> 8       133.0           364.6   64.0
> 12      166.7           436.3   93.4
> 16      175.9           551.2   111.5
> 20      186.3           650.7   133.8
> 24      202.8           717.3   161.2
> 28      207.1           819.3   200.0
> 32      210.6           920.7   226.5
>
>
> Unmodified test8.
> cat suite7-fserver-2.6.0-test8
> Benchmark       Version Machine Run Date
> AIM Multiuser Benchmark - Suite VII     "1.1"   dev4-003
>
> Tasks   Jobs/Min        Real    CPU
> 4       42.3            573.6   40.9
> 8       63.3            765.7   71.6
> 12      83.2            874.2   95.0
> 16      87.5            1108.4  102.5
> 20      105.0           1154.6  136.7
> 24      111.2           1308.1  162.2
> 28      130.7           1297.9  185.8
> 32      134.2           1444.5  212.9
>
>
> My tiobench test hasn't completed yet, but test8 with test5's
> as-iosched.c is making good progress.  I think Nick nailed the
> changeset.
>
> --
> Randy Hron
> http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/bigbox.html
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-10-21 21:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-21 13:05 [BENCHMARK] I/O regression after 2.6.0-test5 rwhron
2003-10-21 15:57 ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-21 21:07 ` venom [this message]
2003-10-22  9:54 ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-22 18:30   ` Dave Olien
2003-10-22 19:08     ` Dave Olien
2003-10-23  2:24     ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-23  3:48       ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-23 20:35       ` Dave Olien
2003-10-23 23:07         ` Nick Piggin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-29  0:38 rwhron
2003-10-27 23:33 John Hawkes
2003-10-26 10:38 rwhron
2003-10-27 23:49 ` Dave Olien
2003-10-24 23:43 rwhron
2003-10-24 12:46 rwhron
2003-10-24  0:10 rwhron
2003-10-20  0:37 rwhron
2003-10-20  1:35 ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-20  4:52   ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-20  8:12     ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-20  4:51 ` Dave Olien
2003-10-20  7:55   ` venom
2003-10-21  4:49     ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-24 13:52 ` Magnus Andersson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.43.0310212306460.4396-100000@cibs9.sns.it \
    --to=venom@sns.it \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dmo@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
    --cc=rwhron@earthlink.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).