From: venom@sns.it
To: rwhron@earthlink.net
Cc: piggin@cyberone.com.au, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<dmo@osdl.org>, <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] I/O regression after 2.6.0-test5
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 23:07:34 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0310212306460.4396-100000@cibs9.sns.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031021130501.GA4409@rushmore>
sql bench on mysql, una master, three slave, with old as-iosched.c
runs mutch better, thanx.
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 rwhron@earthlink.net wrote:
> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 09:05:01 -0400
> From: rwhron@earthlink.net
> To: piggin@cyberone.com.au, venom@sns.it
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmo@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org
> Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] I/O regression after 2.6.0-test5
>
> > If you have time, would you please try testing as-iosched.c from
> > test5 in a later kernel (it won't go into test8-mm1 though).
>
> copying drivers/block/as-iosched.c from 2.6.0-test5 to test8
> looks like it fixes the regression. Here are the results so far.
>
> In the AIM7 database benchmark, jobs/minute using test5 as-iosched.c
> doubled. At 32 tasks, jobs/min went from 300 to 601.
> At 256 tasks, jobs/min went from 552 to 1010.
>
> test5 as-iosched.c:
> cat suite7-dbase-2.6.0-test8-as
> Benchmark Version Machine Run Date
> AIM Multiuser Benchmark - Suite VII "1.1" dev4-003
>
> Tasks Jobs/Min Real CPU
> 32 601.0 316.3 134.0
> 64 782.6 485.8 259.2
> 96 869.1 656.1 387.6
> 128 919.3 827.0 522.8
> 160 955.0 995.2 650.3
> 192 981.9 1161.5 790.9
> 224 1002.3 1327.5 910.2
> 256 1009.9 1505.7 1027.7
>
> Unmodififed test8.
> cat suite7-dbase-2.6.0-test8
> Benchmark Version Machine Run Date
> AIM Multiuser Benchmark - Suite VII "1.1" dev4-003
>
> Tasks Jobs/Min Real CPU
> 32 299.8 634.0 128.6
> 64 450.5 843.9 246.5
> 96 549.7 1037.4 366.0
> 128 558.7 1360.8 497.6
> 160 522.1 1820.2 612.2
> 192 515.5 2212.4 742.7
> 224 529.9 2510.8 859.5
> 256 552.4 2753.0 980.4
>
> The AIM7 fileserver benchmark is back up to previous
> levels when test8 uses the test5 as-iosched.c:
>
>
> test5 as-iosched.c with test8.
> cat suite7-fserver-2.6.0-test8-as
> Benchmark Version Machine Run Date
> AIM Multiuser Benchmark - Suite VII "1.1" dev4-003
>
> Tasks Jobs/Min Real CPU
> 4 80.5 301.0 37.0
> 8 133.0 364.6 64.0
> 12 166.7 436.3 93.4
> 16 175.9 551.2 111.5
> 20 186.3 650.7 133.8
> 24 202.8 717.3 161.2
> 28 207.1 819.3 200.0
> 32 210.6 920.7 226.5
>
>
> Unmodified test8.
> cat suite7-fserver-2.6.0-test8
> Benchmark Version Machine Run Date
> AIM Multiuser Benchmark - Suite VII "1.1" dev4-003
>
> Tasks Jobs/Min Real CPU
> 4 42.3 573.6 40.9
> 8 63.3 765.7 71.6
> 12 83.2 874.2 95.0
> 16 87.5 1108.4 102.5
> 20 105.0 1154.6 136.7
> 24 111.2 1308.1 162.2
> 28 130.7 1297.9 185.8
> 32 134.2 1444.5 212.9
>
>
> My tiobench test hasn't completed yet, but test8 with test5's
> as-iosched.c is making good progress. I think Nick nailed the
> changeset.
>
> --
> Randy Hron
> http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/bigbox.html
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-21 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-21 13:05 [BENCHMARK] I/O regression after 2.6.0-test5 rwhron
2003-10-21 15:57 ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-21 21:07 ` venom [this message]
2003-10-22 9:54 ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-22 18:30 ` Dave Olien
2003-10-22 19:08 ` Dave Olien
2003-10-23 2:24 ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-23 3:48 ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-23 20:35 ` Dave Olien
2003-10-23 23:07 ` Nick Piggin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-29 0:38 rwhron
2003-10-27 23:33 John Hawkes
2003-10-26 10:38 rwhron
2003-10-27 23:49 ` Dave Olien
2003-10-24 23:43 rwhron
2003-10-24 12:46 rwhron
2003-10-24 0:10 rwhron
2003-10-20 0:37 rwhron
2003-10-20 1:35 ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-20 4:52 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-20 8:12 ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-20 4:51 ` Dave Olien
2003-10-20 7:55 ` venom
2003-10-21 4:49 ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-24 13:52 ` Magnus Andersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.43.0310212306460.4396-100000@cibs9.sns.it \
--to=venom@sns.it \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dmo@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
--cc=rwhron@earthlink.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).