linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: "Dieter Nützel" <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>,
	"Linux Kernel List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 7.52 second kernel compile
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 15:53:32 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203181541360.1606-100000@blue1.dev.mcafeelabs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0203181434440.10517-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN, Size: 1625 bytes --]

On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote:

>
> On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Dieter [iso-8859-15] Nützel wrote:
> >
> > it seems to be that it depends on gcc and flags.
>
> That instability doesn't seem to show up on a PII. Interesting. Looks like
> the athlon may be reordering TLB accesses, while the PII apparently
> doesn't.
>
> Or maybe the program is just flawed, and the interesting 1/8 pattern comes
> from something else altogether.


Umhh, something magic should happen inside the Athlon p/line to explain this :


processor       : 0
vendor_id       : AuthenticAMD
cpu family      : 6
model           : 4
model name      : AMD Athlon(tm) Processor
stepping        : 2
cpu MHz         : 999.561
cache size      : 256 KB
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 1
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 sep mtrr pge mca cmov
			pat pse36 mmx fxsr syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow
bogomips        : 1992.29



$ gcc -o tlb_test tlb_test.c

#APP
    rdtsc
#NO_APP
    movl    %eax, -16(%ebp)
    movl    -4(%ebp), %eax
    addl    -12(%ebp), %eax
    movl    (%eax), %eax
#APP
    rdtsc
#NO_APP
    movl    %eax, -20(%ebp)


98.76: 21



$ gcc -O2 -o tlb_test tlb_test.c

#APP
    rdtsc
#NO_APP
    movl    -16(%ebp), %edx
    movl    %eax, %ecx
    movl    (%ebx,%edx), %eax
#APP
    rdtsc
#NO_APP
    subl    %ecx, %eax


97.59: 94


The only thing i can think is that stuff is moved between the two rdtsc
... maybe a barrier should help to have more consistent results.




- Davide



  reply	other threads:[~2002-03-18 23:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-18 22:12 7.52 second kernel compile Dieter Nützel
2002-03-18 22:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-18 23:53   ` Davide Libenzi [this message]
2002-03-19  0:20   ` David S. Miller
2002-03-19  0:47     ` Davide Libenzi
2002-03-19  1:37     ` Andreas Ferber
2002-03-19  1:38       ` David S. Miller
2002-03-19  2:08     ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-19  5:24       ` Erik Andersen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-13  8:52 10.31 " Anton Blanchard
2002-03-16  6:15 ` 7.52 " Anton Blanchard
2002-03-16  8:05   ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-16 11:54     ` yodaiken
2002-03-16 11:04   ` Paul Mackerras
2002-03-16 18:32     ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-17  2:00     ` Paul Mackerras
2002-03-17  2:40       ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-17  2:50         ` M. Edward Borasky
2002-03-18 19:42       ` Cort Dougan
2002-03-18 20:04         ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-18 20:23           ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-18 21:50             ` Rene Herman
2002-03-18 22:36             ` Cort Dougan
2002-03-18 22:47               ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-18 22:56                 ` Cort Dougan
2002-03-18 23:52                 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-03-19  0:57                   ` Dave Jones
2002-03-19  3:35                     ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-19  0:22                 ` David S. Miller
2002-03-19  0:27                   ` Cort Dougan
2002-03-19  0:27                     ` David S. Miller
2002-03-19  0:36                       ` Cort Dougan
2002-03-19  0:38                         ` David S. Miller
2002-03-19  1:28                           ` Davide Libenzi
2002-03-19  2:42             ` Paul Mackerras
2002-03-27  2:53             ` Richard Henderson
2002-04-02  4:32               ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-02 10:50             ` Pablo Alcaraz
2002-03-18 21:34           ` Cort Dougan
2002-03-18 22:00             ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-18 19:37     ` Cort Dougan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0203181541360.1606-100000@blue1.dev.mcafeelabs.com \
    --to=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).