From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 18 May 2002 01:57:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 18 May 2002 01:57:30 -0400 Received: from chaos.physics.uiowa.edu ([128.255.34.189]:43415 "EHLO chaos.physics.uiowa.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 18 May 2002 01:57:29 -0400 Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 00:57:08 -0500 (CDT) From: Kai Germaschewski X-X-Sender: kai@chaos.physics.uiowa.edu To: Daniel Phillips cc: Andreas Dilger , "Albert D. Cahalan" , Subject: Re: Htree directory index for Ext2, updated In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 18 May 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote: > - Somebody decided to add another level on top of the linux root directory > in their source directory. I can't import patches into that. > > - I can apply patches to bitkeeper repository using the normal 'patch', > but Bitkeeper gets its revenge later, as each bk edit command starts > off by throwing away the patch. Hmmh, that's always worked for me. Actually I always apply patches by hand (not with bk import), and as my "patch" knows about SCCS, it automatically checks out files as needed. After that they are in "bk edit" status, so another bk edit just won't do anything. So for me, it plays just well together. (patch 2.5.4) --Kai