From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 17:14:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 17:14:48 -0400 Received: from stargazer.compendium-tech.com ([64.156.208.76]:51472 "EHLO stargazer.compendium.us") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 17:14:47 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 14:16:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Kelsey Hudson X-X-Sender: khudson@betelgeuse.compendium-tech.com To: James Bourne cc: Hugh Dickins , "Reed, Timothy A" , Subject: Re: Hyperthreading In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, James Bourne wrote: > On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > > You do need CONFIG_SMP and a processor capable of HyperThreading, > > i.e. Pentium 4 XEON; but CONFIG_MPENTIUM4 is not necessary for HT, > > just appropriate to that processor in other ways. > > I was under the impression that the only CPU capable of hyperthreading was > the P4 Xeon. Is this not correct? I don't know of any other CPUs that > have the ht feature. This is currently correct, although I believe Intel has plans to release a Hyperthreading-capable version of its desktop P4. > Also, looking at setup.c it's hard to determine if CONFIG_SMP is > actually required, but it doesn't look like it... Of course it's required. How are you to take advantage of a "second CPU" if your scheduler only works on a uniprocessor machine? -- Kelsey Hudson khudson@compendium.us Software Engineer/UNIX Systems Administrator Compendium Technologies, Inc (619) 725-0771 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------