* [Patch 0/7] 2.4.20-pre4/ext3: ext3 minor improvements
@ 2002-09-26 13:55 Stephen Tweedie
2002-09-27 20:44 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2002-10-29 19:00 ` ext3 dies without inodes David Fries
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Tweedie @ 2002-09-26 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marcelo Tosatti, linux-kernel; +Cc: Stephen Tweedie
This patch set contains a couple of minor fixups for ext3 on 2.4, plus
a couple of new checks and functionality aimed at helping InterMezzo.
It also brings the ext3 version up to the current cvs version number.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch 0/7] 2.4.20-pre4/ext3: ext3 minor improvements
2002-09-26 13:55 [Patch 0/7] 2.4.20-pre4/ext3: ext3 minor improvements Stephen Tweedie
@ 2002-09-27 20:44 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2002-09-27 22:44 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-10-29 19:00 ` ext3 dies without inodes David Fries
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Tosatti @ 2002-09-27 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Tweedie; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Stephen Tweedie wrote:
> This patch set contains a couple of minor fixups for ext3 on 2.4, plus
> a couple of new checks and functionality aimed at helping InterMezzo.
> It also brings the ext3 version up to the current cvs version number.
I guess you missed the patch, Stephen ;)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch 0/7] 2.4.20-pre4/ext3: ext3 minor improvements
2002-09-27 22:44 ` Andreas Dilger
@ 2002-09-27 21:01 ` Marcelo Tosatti
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Tosatti @ 2002-09-27 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Dilger; +Cc: Stephen Tweedie, linux-kernel
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Sep 27, 2002 17:44 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Stephen Tweedie wrote:
> > > This patch set contains a couple of minor fixups for ext3 on 2.4, plus
> > > a couple of new checks and functionality aimed at helping InterMezzo.
> > > It also brings the ext3 version up to the current cvs version number.
> >
> > I guess you missed the patch, Stephen ;)
>
> No, they were in separate emails following this one (numbered 0/7).
> This was just the overview of all the patches.
Ok, silly: Should have read the whole message.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch 0/7] 2.4.20-pre4/ext3: ext3 minor improvements
2002-09-27 20:44 ` Marcelo Tosatti
@ 2002-09-27 22:44 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-09-27 21:01 ` Marcelo Tosatti
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Dilger @ 2002-09-27 22:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marcelo Tosatti; +Cc: Stephen Tweedie, linux-kernel
On Sep 27, 2002 17:44 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Stephen Tweedie wrote:
> > This patch set contains a couple of minor fixups for ext3 on 2.4, plus
> > a couple of new checks and functionality aimed at helping InterMezzo.
> > It also brings the ext3 version up to the current cvs version number.
>
> I guess you missed the patch, Stephen ;)
No, they were in separate emails following this one (numbered 0/7).
This was just the overview of all the patches.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* ext3 dies without inodes
2002-09-26 13:55 [Patch 0/7] 2.4.20-pre4/ext3: ext3 minor improvements Stephen Tweedie
2002-09-27 20:44 ` Marcelo Tosatti
@ 2002-10-29 19:00 ` David Fries
2002-10-29 19:14 ` Andreas Dilger
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Fries @ 2002-10-29 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Tweedie; +Cc: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3238 bytes --]
I'm runnig 2.4.19 and Debian (but I compile my own kernel from the
sources). ext3 is forcing the block device to be read only when I run
out of inodes, and the only way out is reboot (that I could tell).
This is wrose than a good deal of kernel panics I've had. Is
2.4.20prewhatever any better with reguard to this error?
My system is running low on inodes (my fault), and back when I was
using ext2 everything was fine, I would run out, the kernel would give
the message about no more space on disk for everything that needed an
inode until I freed up some. With ext3 I get one message saying no
more space on disk and then everything else gives, readonly file
system.
After I hit the problem accidently, I verified running out of inodes
was the problem on purpose. I would hate to think that I had to
reboot everytime I filled up my harddrive, and it is an equally bad
behavior to reboot when I run out of inodes.
Here is some dmesg output.
EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,2)) in ext3_new_inode: error 28
Aborting journal on device ide0(3,2).
Remounting filesystem read-only
EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,2)) in ext3_create: IO failure
EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,2)) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted
EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,2)) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted
ext3_abort called.
EXT3-fs abort (device ide0(3,2)): ext3_remount: Abort forced by user
ext3_abort called.
EXT3-fs abort (device ide0(3,2)): ext3_remount: Abort forced by user
ext3_abort called.
EXT3-fs abort (device ide0(3,2)): ext3_remount: Abort forced by user
ext3_abort called.
EXT3-fs abort (device ide0(3,2)): ext3_remount: Abort forced by user
EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,2)) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted
EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,2)) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted
EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,2)) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted
EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,2)) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted
EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,2)) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted
EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,2)) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted
EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,2)) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted
EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,2)) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted
EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,2)) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted
EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,2)) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted
EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,2)) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted
EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,2)) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted
EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,2)) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted
EXT3-fs error (device ide0(3,2)) in start_transaction: Journal has aborted
ext3_abort called.
EXT3-fs abort (device ide0(3,2)): ext3_remount: Abort forced by user
ext3_abort called.
EXT3-fs abort (device ide0(3,2)): ext3_remount: Abort forced by user
SpacedOut:/mnt/david/tuxscreen/buildroot-tux/build$ df -i
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
/dev/hda2 362304 361710 594 100% /
/dev/hdb1 1664640 210988 1453652 13% /mnt/hdb1
--
David Fries <dfries@mail.win.org>
http://fries.net/~david/pgpkey.txt
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: ext3 dies without inodes
2002-10-29 19:00 ` ext3 dies without inodes David Fries
@ 2002-10-29 19:14 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-10-29 20:11 ` Stephen Tweedie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Dilger @ 2002-10-29 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Fries; +Cc: Stephen Tweedie, linux-kernel
On Oct 29, 2002 13:00 -0600, David Fries wrote:
> I'm runnig 2.4.19 and Debian (but I compile my own kernel from the
> sources). ext3 is forcing the block device to be read only when I run
> out of inodes, and the only way out is reboot (that I could tell).
> This is wrose than a good deal of kernel panics I've had. Is
> 2.4.20prewhatever any better with reguard to this error?
Yes, this is fixed in more recent kernels. Separate patches are also
available if you want to stick with 2.4.19 for whatever reason.
Stephen posted a URL for them a couple of times.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: ext3 dies without inodes
2002-10-29 19:14 ` Andreas Dilger
@ 2002-10-29 20:11 ` Stephen Tweedie
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Tweedie @ 2002-10-29 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Fries, Stephen Tweedie, linux-kernel
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 12:14:53PM -0700, Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com> wrote:
> On Oct 29, 2002 13:00 -0600, David Fries wrote:
> > I'm runnig 2.4.19 and Debian (but I compile my own kernel from the
> > sources). ext3 is forcing the block device to be read only when I run
> > out of inodes, and the only way out is reboot (that I could tell).
> > This is wrose than a good deal of kernel panics I've had. Is
> > 2.4.20prewhatever any better with reguard to this error?
> Yes, this is fixed in more recent kernels. Separate patches are also
> available if you want to stick with 2.4.19 for whatever reason.
> Stephen posted a URL for them a couple of times.
http://people.redhat.com/sct/patches/ext3-2.4/for-2.4.19/all-in-one.patch
Cheers,
Stephen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-10-29 20:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-09-26 13:55 [Patch 0/7] 2.4.20-pre4/ext3: ext3 minor improvements Stephen Tweedie
2002-09-27 20:44 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2002-09-27 22:44 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-09-27 21:01 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2002-10-29 19:00 ` ext3 dies without inodes David Fries
2002-10-29 19:14 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-10-29 20:11 ` Stephen Tweedie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).