From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S262122AbSI3QmV>; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:42:21 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S262336AbSI3QmV>; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:42:21 -0400
Received: from 62-37-98-84.dialup.uni2.es ([62.37.98.84]:39433 "EHLO
	pau.intranet.ct") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S262122AbSI3QmU>;
	Mon, 30 Sep 2002 12:42:20 -0400
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:47:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: Pau Aliagas <linuxnow@wanadoo.es>
X-X-Sender: pau@pau.intranet.ct
To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: v2.6 vs v3.0
In-Reply-To: <200209290114.15994.jdickens@ameritech.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209301031390.4268-100000@pau.intranet.ct>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, james wrote:

> I know this whole ide mess have taken me away from the devolemental series. 
> And I bet a lot of others. 

That is precisely what has kept me out of 2.5. I do not want to risk my 
data due to the IDE problems; otherwise I'd be happy testing 2.5 all 
around in all kind of machines I had available.

Pau