From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Workqueue Abstraction, 2.5.40-H7
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 23:30:17 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210012328020.25070-100000@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D9A0E46.3070608@pobox.com>
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> At the risk of being on-topic <g>, would it be reasonable to request a
> 2.4 version of this patch, that can be used in driver-compat code and
> vendor kernels? i.e. something that makes the workqueue API work in
> 2.4, no more, no less.
i've concentrated all the code into kernel/workqueue.c, and all the
interfaces into include/linux/workqueue.h - so you can simply copy those
into the 2.4 tree and it should just work. There should be no namespace
collision either. A O(1) scheduler tree is needed, due to
set_cpus_allowed(), but there is no other dependency i think.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-01 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-01 16:24 [patch] Workqueue Abstraction, 2.5.40-H7 Ingo Molnar
2002-10-01 17:55 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-10-01 21:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-01 18:04 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-01 18:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-01 21:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-01 21:30 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2002-10-01 19:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-10-01 19:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-10-01 21:32 ` Kristian Hogsberg
2002-10-03 18:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-04 23:20 ` Kristian Hogsberg
2002-10-02 4:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-01 21:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-02 8:22 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-10-08 3:50 ` Jeff Dike
2002-10-01 18:52 Marc-Christian Petersen
2002-10-02 3:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-10-01 20:29 Ingo Molnar
2002-10-01 20:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-10-01 21:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-02 3:23 ` Miles Bader
2002-10-02 19:18 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-10-01 21:09 ` Jes Sorensen
2002-10-01 21:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-10-03 1:38 ` Kevin O'Connor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0210012328020.25070-100000@localhost.localdomain \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).