From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 19:05:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 19:05:01 -0400 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:36876 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 19:05:00 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 16:12:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Tim Hockin cc: Martin Schwidefsky , Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.41 s390 (8/8): 16 bit uid/gids. In-Reply-To: <200210092243.g99MhZ701270@www.hockin.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Tim Hockin wrote: > > Renaming it, if that is all you want, is fine by everyone, I'm sure. I was > trying to make the point that it is NOT a config option, because for some > architectures, you only want it defined for SOME FILES. No. I'm not going to accept crap like that. It's either defined or not. None of the "only sometimes". Make a CONFIG_xxx option that means what s390 wants it to mean, and no, I'm not going to accept it if you #define that by hand in some .c file. It needs to be in the architecture config file, like all the other config options. Linus