From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S263194AbTCSWSC>; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:18:02 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S263196AbTCSWSB>; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:18:01 -0500
Received: from smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.139]:12808 "EHLO
	smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S263194AbTCSWR5>; Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:17:57 -0500
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 23:28:44 +0100 (CET)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
X-X-Sender: roman@serv
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
cc: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, <akpm@digeo.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dev_t [1/3]
In-Reply-To: <20030319220151.GA16947@kroah.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303192323120.12110-100000@serv>
References: <UTC200303182145.h2ILjEB29313.aeb@smtp.cwi.nl>
 <20030319220151.GA16947@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Greg KH wrote:

> I've been beating on these three patches and don't seem to have any
> problems.  And I see Andrew has put them in his -mm tree too.

I disagree, give me a bit more time and I have an alternative patch. 
Alternatively I'd prefer to see an explicit ack from Al.

bye, Roman