From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 18:24:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 18:24:42 -0500 Received: from smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.138]:9991 "EHLO smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 18:24:41 -0500 Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 01:35:51 +0200 (CEST) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@serv To: Joel Becker cc: bert hubert , Greg KH , Alan Cox , , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Wim Coekaerts Subject: Re: 64-bit kdev_t - just for playing In-Reply-To: <20030331230720.GP32000@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> Message-ID: References: <1048805732.3953.1.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20030327234820.GE1687@kroah.com> <20030328180545.GG32000@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <20030331083157.GA29029@outpost.ds9a.nl> <20030331172403.GM32000@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <20030331230720.GP32000@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Joel Becker wrote: > I'm right here campaigning loudly for a larger dev_t. I intend > to never, ever make assumptions about dev_t. In fact, I'd rather not > deal with dev_t. But I do need a way to map 4k or 8k or 16k disks. > now. Fine, so write the software to do this, but what exactly is there still for the kernel to do? bye, Roman