From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S264953AbTGCQe0 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Thu, 3 Jul 2003 12:34:26 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264776AbTGCQKs
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 3 Jul 2003 12:10:48 -0400
Received: from air-2.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:48271 "EHLO mail.osdl.org")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264953AbTGCQGj (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 3 Jul 2003 12:06:39 -0400
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 09:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>
X-X-Sender: mochel@cherise
To: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wiktor Wodecki <wodecki@gmx.de>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: 2.5.74-mm1
In-Reply-To: <20030703171908.C20336@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307030922530.14925-100000@cherise>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


> Do you know which kernel version first exhibited these problems?  Was
> .73 ok for you?

I actually just got the laptop 2 days ago, so the first I tried was 
equivalent to probably 2.5.73-bk9.


	-pat