From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269896AbTGKKt6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 06:49:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269897AbTGKKt6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 06:49:58 -0400 Received: from netcore.fi ([193.94.160.1]:6412 "EHLO netcore.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269896AbTGKKty (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2003 06:49:54 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 14:04:28 +0300 (EEST) From: Pekka Savola To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?= cc: mika.liljeberg@welho.com, , , Subject: Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked In-Reply-To: <20030711.200357.33143193.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] 吉藤英明 wrote: > In article (at Fri, 11 Jul 2003 13:59:14 +0300 (EEST)), Pekka Savola says: > > > > So, you cannot remove subnet router anycast address from > > > kernel via this interface; kernel keeps one reference. > > > > .. which is why kernel shouldn't keep *any* reference *at all*! > > No, it is because REQUIRED and UNREMOVABLE anycast address. Smells like a circular requirement :-) > I don't think it is good to change this. That's another issue entirely. -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings