From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269024AbTGORdl (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:33:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268938AbTGORdl (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:33:41 -0400 Received: from pub234.cambridge.redhat.com ([213.86.99.234]:265 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269219AbTGORdX (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:33:23 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:48:12 +0100 (BST) From: James Simmons To: Alan Cox cc: Ro0tSiEgE LKML , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: -ac kernels In-Reply-To: <1058290104.3845.49.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > What patches in the -ac kernels get put into the mainstream kernel? For > > instance, I would assume that fixes in 2.6.0-test1-ac1 would make it into > > 2.6.0-test2, but I'm not sure how that works, surely no one is just dropping > > those fixes and not applying them at some point to the mainline kernels. So > > I guess my question is, at what point does Linus' tree sync with Alan's? > > I'm trying to hoover up patches that make things work so it can get more > people testing more and more driver stuff so that when Linus is back I > can nuke his mailbox from orbit... I will create a -ac patch in the next few days. Alot of important fixes. Many more fixes to go tho.