From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269450AbTGOSqy (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2003 14:46:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269514AbTGOSqy (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2003 14:46:54 -0400 Received: from bay-bridge.veritas.com ([143.127.3.10]:6305 "EHLO mtvmime03.VERITAS.COM") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269450AbTGOSqA (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2003 14:46:00 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 20:02:17 +0100 (BST) From: Hugh Dickins X-X-Sender: hugh@localhost.localdomain To: "Brown, Len" cc: "Grover, Andrew" , ACPI-Devel mailing list , , Marcelo Tosatti Subject: RE: ACPI patches updated (20030714) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Brown, Len wrote: > > What's the schedule for Len's rework to Marcelo? > > I'm testing today and expect to push via Andy > (http://linux-acpi.bkbits.net/to-andy-2.4) when when I'm satisifed I > haven't toasted anything -- probably Wednesday. Oh, thanks, that sounds very good, much the best if I don't interfere. Three comments below. > !ACPI && ACPI_HT_ONLY > Minimal kernel to enable HT -- no ACPI > acpi=cpu is the default behaviour here > if somebody wants to disable ht, they can use "noht" > This matches RHL's 2.4 distribution > > ACPI && !ACPI_HT_ONLY > Full ACPI w/o the acpi=cpu option > Maybe OSD's will get here some day Shouldn't this combination also support "noht", or is that too much to ask? > acpismp=force > TODO: Delete. Hurrah! > noht > Keep > TODO: fix > Disable HT for benefit of systems which perform better with HT > disabled, but > have a BIOS incapable of disabling HT. > currently broken in 2.5 And it's currently broken in 2.4 also. Thanks, Hugh