From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271518AbTGQRW3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2003 13:22:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271519AbTGQRW3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2003 13:22:29 -0400 Received: from pub234.cambridge.redhat.com ([213.86.99.234]:32007 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S271518AbTGQRW1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jul 2003 13:22:27 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 18:37:20 +0100 (BST) From: James Simmons To: Dave Jones cc: Alan Cox , , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test1-ac1 Matrox Compile Error In-Reply-To: <20030717170708.GB4280@suse.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Strange that CONFIG_VT would get set to no. Another huge issue is that > > people are configuring several framebuffer drivers to run the same piece > > of hardware. > > A number of people seem to be seeing regressions with vesafb too. > Configs that worked with 2.4 give a blank screen, and lock up under 2.5 > I believe vga=791 was one such option. They are forgetting to set CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE. P.S I have had VESA compiled without framebuffer console but with mdacon instead. If they would log in a do a cat /dev/urandom > /dev/fb0 they would see that the VESA fbdev driver is functional.