archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Henrik Nordstrom <>
To: Jeff Dike <>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0-test1
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 23:57:08 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Jeff Dike wrote:

> This patch updates UML to 2.6.0-test1.  There are no functional changes.

What is the current status of UML for 2.6? As usable as the 2.4 (barring
generic kernel issues) or is there areas still neeed to be looked into for
the UML port to 2.6?

Any news on the possibility of having more of UML merged into the 2.6 
tree? Would be a pity if the release contains a UML architecture which is 
not working well..


  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-26 21:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-26 21:48 uml-patch-2.6.0-test1 Jeff Dike
2003-07-26 21:57 ` Henrik Nordstrom [this message]
2003-07-27  0:34   ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0-test1 Jeff Dike
2003-07-27 19:26     ` steven james
2003-08-15 19:45       ` Jeff Dike

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).