From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S270329AbTGZVmC (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sat, 26 Jul 2003 17:42:02 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270363AbTGZVmC
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sat, 26 Jul 2003 17:42:02 -0400
Received: from marasystems.com ([213.150.153.194]:9100 "EHLO
	filer.marasystems.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S270329AbTGZVmB (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 26 Jul 2003 17:42:01 -0400
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 23:57:08 +0200 (CEST)
From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@marasystems.com>
X-X-Sender: henrik@filer.marasystems.com
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0-test1
In-Reply-To: <200307262149.h6QLmwCB009679@uml.karaya.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307262354330.18375-100000@filer.marasystems.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Jeff Dike wrote:

> This patch updates UML to 2.6.0-test1.  There are no functional changes.

What is the current status of UML for 2.6? As usable as the 2.4 (barring
generic kernel issues) or is there areas still neeed to be looked into for
the UML port to 2.6?

Any news on the possibility of having more of UML merged into the 2.6 
tree? Would be a pity if the release contains a UML architecture which is 
not working well..

Regards
Henrik