From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S272145AbTG2VeN (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:34:13 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272143AbTG2VdX
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:33:23 -0400
Received: from pub234.cambridge.redhat.com ([213.86.99.234]:53511 "EHLO
	phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S272407AbTG2Vbf (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:31:35 -0400
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:31:30 +0100 (BST)
From: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
cc: Petr Vandrovec <VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz>,
       linux-kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Linux Fbdev development list 
	<linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Framebuffer: client notification mecanism & PM
In-Reply-To: <1059510171.8538.53.camel@gaston>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307292231180.5874-100000@phoenix.infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


> > I knew it was a matter of time before "client" management would happen. 
> > Is this a 2.6.X thing tho or shoudl we wait for the next developement 
> > cycle. I don't mind working on experimental stuff.
> 
> We need that now for proper power management.

Okay.