From: Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you?
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 16:07:40 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309091604070.695-100000@cherise> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030909225410.GD211@elf.ucw.cz>
> I do think this is a bit complicated. I believe passing level, along
> with type of the suspend (aka swsusp vs. S4bios) should be enough.
What about suspend-to-ram, APM, and runtime states?
That actually makes it quite a bit more complicated, globally. By forcing
the policy down to the drivers, you force each one to interpret the value
themselves and make the decision. By doing it centrally, the only thing
the low-level drivers have to worry about is going into the state.
Pat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-09 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-22 21:08 [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you? Pavel Machek
2003-08-22 21:25 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-08-22 21:53 ` Pavel Machek
2003-08-22 22:05 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-08-23 1:03 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-08-23 16:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-08-25 19:05 ` [PM] powering down special devices Patrick Mochel
2003-08-25 19:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-08-25 9:52 ` [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you? Pavel Machek
2003-08-22 22:10 ` Pavel Machek
2003-08-22 22:13 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-08-22 22:17 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-08-22 22:36 ` Pavel Machek
2003-08-23 10:47 ` Russell King
2003-08-24 11:54 ` Russell King
2003-08-26 15:39 ` [PM] Config Options Patrick Mochel
2003-08-24 12:08 ` [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you? Russell King
2003-08-25 15:47 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-08-25 16:27 ` Russell King
2003-08-25 16:57 ` Matt Porter
2003-08-25 17:14 ` Russell King
2003-08-25 17:34 ` Matt Porter
2003-08-28 15:38 ` Platform Devices Patrick Mochel
2003-09-01 12:02 ` [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you? Pavel Machek
2003-09-02 17:41 ` Jens Axboe
2003-09-09 20:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-09-09 20:24 ` Jens Axboe
2003-09-09 21:43 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-09 22:54 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-09 23:07 ` Patrick Mochel [this message]
2003-09-09 23:07 ` [PM] Passing suspend level down to drivers Pavel Machek
2003-09-09 23:23 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-10 0:06 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-10 6:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
2003-09-10 11:48 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-09 23:15 ` [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you? Alan Cox
2003-09-09 22:56 ` Pavel Machek
2003-08-25 17:16 ` Russell King
2003-08-22 22:04 ` Timothy Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0309091604070.695-100000@cherise \
--to=mochel@osdl.org \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).