From: "Mark W. Alexander" <slash@dotnetslash.net>
To: Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pm: Revert swsusp to 2.6.0-test3
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:16:42 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309292113200.6091-100000@llave.eproinet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309291747020.968-100000@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Patrick Mochel wrote:
>
> > Are both versions compatible? How to resume the right version?
> > Or simply resume=/dev/hda3 and the kernel will pick the right
> > mechanism to resume?
>
> No, they are not compatible. The resume= command line parameter will be
> trapped by the swsusp code. When using pmdisk, you may set the partition
> you want to use for suspend/resume via the CONFIG_PMDISK_PARTITION
> compile-time option. Or, you may override that using the pmdisk= command
> line parameter.
>
> I realize it's a bit confusing, but I will write documentation that
> explicitly describes the differences within the week.
While you're at it, please throw in some notes about how to resume from
memory too. I just started playing with it and, although it suspends
great I see no obvious way to wake it up. (Power button flashes lights
once on & off. Next power press reboots.)
--
Mark W. Alexander
slash@dotnetslash.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-30 1:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-28 12:05 pm: Revert swsusp to 2.6.0-test3 pavel
2003-09-28 17:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-09-28 17:58 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-28 20:24 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-29 16:13 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-29 19:24 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-29 20:46 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-29 21:34 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-29 21:59 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-30 0:43 ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2003-09-30 0:48 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-30 1:16 ` Mark W. Alexander [this message]
2003-09-28 18:48 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-09-28 19:06 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-29 16:51 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-29 18:49 ` Nigel Cunningham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0309292113200.6091-100000@llave.eproinet.com \
--to=slash@dotnetslash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochel@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).