From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263681AbTJ0XN6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2003 18:13:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263700AbTJ0XN6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2003 18:13:58 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:2001 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263681AbTJ0XN5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2003 18:13:57 -0500 Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:13:03 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Andries Brouwer cc: Andi Kleen , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] PS/2 mouse rate setting In-Reply-To: <20031027224728.GA10618@win.tue.nl> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Andries Brouwer wrote: > Ergo, there is no reason to have it a boot parameter. I'd agree. I don't really see the point of setting rate/resolution at _all_. But we've done it in 2.5.x, and somebody may have a valid reason for it, so when disabling it by default, leaving the option to specialize is probably a good idea. Linus