From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264075AbTKJTYo (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:24:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264076AbTKJTYo (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:24:44 -0500 Received: from x35.xmailserver.org ([69.30.125.51]:28047 "EHLO x35.xmailserver.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264075AbTKJTYn (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:24:43 -0500 X-AuthUser: davidel@xmailserver.org Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:23:54 -0800 (PST) From: Davide Libenzi X-X-Sender: davide@bigblue.dev.mdolabs.com To: "H. Peter Anvin" cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Larry McVoy , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air In-Reply-To: <3FAFE22B.3030108@zytor.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > > you must pick file2 before file1: > > > > you: > > > > do > > get file2 > > get repo-file1-j > > get file1 > > while file2 != file1 && sleep 10 > > > > Okay... I'm starting to think the sequencing requirements on these files > may be hard to maintain across multiple levels of rsync... but perhaps > I'm wrong, in particular if 'file2' sorts hierachially-lexically last > and 'file1' first... Doing something like: rsync file2 rsync repo rsync file1 should work, doesn't it? - Davide