From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264319AbTLBTVE (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 14:21:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264321AbTLBTVE (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 14:21:04 -0500 Received: from intra.cyclades.com ([64.186.161.6]:21154 "EHLO intra.cyclades.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264319AbTLBTVB (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 14:21:01 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 17:12:53 -0200 (BRST) From: Marcelo Tosatti X-X-Sender: marcelo@logos.cnet To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Larry McVoy , Murthy Kambhampaty , "'Marcelo Tosatti'" , Russell Cattelan , Nathan Scott , , , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: XFS for 2.4 In-Reply-To: <20031202182746.A27964@infradead.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 06:23:46PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 10:20:37AM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote: > > > So what's wrong with asking $VFS_MAINTAINER to refresh Marcelo's memory > > > about that? > > > > There is no such thing as a VFS maintainer. At least Al doesn't want > > to be in that position and I guess no one else would qualify (maybe > > akpm) > > And akpm queued up most of these patches in -mm and revieved them > before they went into 2.5, but he is (fortunately for him :)) on > vacation so you shouldn't expect any respone from him here. Ok, Christoph agreed to review the changes. He has a clue about VFS. If he is OK with them, I'll merge the generic XFS changes.