From: John Jasen <jjasen@realityfailure.org>
To: Jan Rychter <jan@rychter.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4 future
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 10:33:32 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312051021300.1469-100000@bushido> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2k75dzj6n.fsf@tnuctip.rychter.com>
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Jan Rychter wrote:
> >>>>> "Marcelo" == Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>:
> Marcelo> The intention of this email is to clarify my position on 2.4.x
> Marcelo> future.
>
> Marcelo> 2.6 is becoming more stable each day, and we will hopefully
> Marcelo> see a 2.6.0 release during this month or January.
I would argue that 2.2 wasn't really usable until somewhere around 2.2.12.
I would also claim that 2.4 wasn't useful until 2.4.10.
If we continue to improve along these lines, can I expect 2.6 to be
generally usable somewhere around 2.6.8? :)
> On my notebook, I have spent the last two years going through regular
> painful kernel patching and upgrades.
<snip>
His experiences pretty much mirror my own -- ACPI has been an adventure,
cpufreq occasionally didn't work, full USB doesn't work without ACPI, I
need alsa drivers and ACPI in order to have acceptable sound, and I need
to use GATOS drivers for my display, else 3d just blows chunks.
For the longest time on this beast, kernel upgrades were a day long
adventure.
First, to push in acpi, cpufreq, and freeswan. (Oh, look, 2.4.foo is
out ... but the latest ACPI patch was 2.4.foo-prebar and CPUfreq is
2.4.foo-pre(bar-2)-3weeks-earlier ... time to patch and resolve
rejections!)
Then it was off to put in alsa, radoen, freeswan, linux-wlan-ng and so
forth ...
Some things should be migrated in and updated. drm modules, for example. I
would also vote for alsa being merged. ACPI was brought up to date in
2.4.22, I believe, but I haven't checked since then. It should also be
relativelt current, IMHO.
> 1) Please don't stop working (and that does include pulling in new
> stuff) on 2.4, as many people still have to use it.
>
> 2) Please don't start developing 2.7 too soon. Go for at least 6
> months of bug-fixing. During that time, patches with new features
> will accumulate anyway, so it isn't lost time. But it will at least
> prevent people from saying "well, I use 2.7.45 and it works for
> me".
I have to agree with both of these points. 2.6.0 will probably have
problems that will take a while to sort out. Putting it on systems to test
is one thing, putting it into production as its the only blessed solution
is another ...
--
-- John E. Jasen (jjasen@realityfailure.org)
-- User Error #2361: Please insert coffee and try again.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-05 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-01 14:25 Linux 2.4 future Marcelo Tosatti
2003-12-01 15:04 ` Ian Kent
2003-12-01 15:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-12-01 21:36 ` Peter C. Norton
2003-12-01 23:54 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-12-02 1:11 ` Ian Kent
2003-12-02 20:13 ` Peter C. Norton
2003-12-02 20:10 ` Peter C. Norton
2003-12-02 20:18 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-12-02 20:46 ` Peter C. Norton
2003-12-03 1:23 ` Ian Kent
2003-12-03 10:36 ` Matthias Andree
2003-12-03 14:49 ` Ian Kent
2003-12-03 15:00 ` Matthias Andree
2003-12-04 6:24 ` Ian Kent
2003-12-02 21:56 ` Bryan Whitehead
2003-12-02 8:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-12-02 1:09 ` Ian Kent
2003-12-02 2:23 ` snpe
2003-12-02 6:39 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-12-02 18:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-02 18:45 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-12-02 19:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-02 19:13 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-12-02 19:39 ` Gene Heskett
2003-12-02 20:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-02 20:32 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-12-02 21:48 ` Gene Heskett
2003-12-02 21:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-03 2:36 ` Harald Arnesen
2003-12-03 9:21 ` Helge Hafting
2003-12-02 19:59 ` snpe
2003-12-02 22:30 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-12-02 22:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-12-03 14:08 ` snpe
2003-12-03 13:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-12-02 8:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-12-01 15:26 ` Norberto Bensa
2003-12-01 23:30 ` 2.6 security patches merged? was: " Mike Fedyk
2003-12-02 0:06 ` Chris Wright
2003-12-02 0:58 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-12-02 1:56 ` Chris Wright
2003-12-02 11:55 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-12-02 9:00 ` Matthias Andree
2003-12-02 11:54 ` Ionut Georgescu
2003-12-02 12:03 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-12-02 13:13 ` Ionut Georgescu
2003-12-02 13:38 ` Ed Sweetman
2003-12-02 14:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-12-02 16:01 ` Ionut Georgescu
2003-12-02 16:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-02 18:20 ` John Bradford
2003-12-02 20:19 ` Ville Herva
2003-12-02 21:40 ` Chris Wright
2003-12-02 20:09 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-12-02 20:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-12-02 20:45 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-12-02 21:03 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0312021402360.17892@moje.vabo.cz>
[not found] ` <20031202131512.GU13388@conectiva.com.br>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0312021433360.8417@moje.vabo.cz>
[not found] ` <20031202135423.GB13388@conectiva.com.br>
2003-12-02 20:21 ` Tomas Konir
2003-12-02 18:53 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-12-02 19:06 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-12-02 23:13 ` Jose Luis Domingo Lopez
2003-12-03 18:22 ` bill davidsen
2003-12-04 1:24 ` jw schultz
2003-12-04 1:47 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-12-04 3:45 ` Tim Connors
2003-12-04 5:41 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-12-05 0:14 ` jw schultz
2003-12-01 15:56 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-12-01 21:02 ` David S. Miller
2003-12-03 21:26 ` Jan Rychter
2003-12-03 20:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-03 21:14 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-12-05 15:33 ` John Jasen [this message]
2003-12-05 22:23 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-12-06 15:49 ` Max Valdez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0312051021300.1469-100000@bushido \
--to=jjasen@realityfailure.org \
--cc=jan@rychter.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).