From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264342AbTLQLd5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2003 06:33:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264362AbTLQLd5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2003 06:33:57 -0500 Received: from nat-pool-bos.redhat.com ([66.187.230.200]:3605 "EHLO chimarrao.boston.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264342AbTLQLd4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2003 06:33:56 -0500 Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 06:33:36 -0500 (EST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@chimarrao.boston.redhat.com To: Roger Luethi cc: Andrew Morton , Andrea Arcangeli , , , , , Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test9 - poor swap performance on low end machines In-Reply-To: <20031217110336.GA5615@k3.hellgate.ch> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Roger Luethi wrote: > Defaults to 0 anyway, doesn't it? Duh, right... -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan