From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265144AbTLRNxR (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 08:53:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265145AbTLRNxQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 08:53:16 -0500 Received: from intra.cyclades.com ([64.186.161.6]:26262 "EHLO intra.cyclades.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265144AbTLRNxN (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2003 08:53:13 -0500 Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:41:11 -0200 (BRST) From: Marcelo Tosatti X-X-Sender: marcelo@logos.cnet To: Martin Knoblauch Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RAID-0 read perf. decrease after 2.4.20 In-Reply-To: <20031216125103.6301.qmail@web13903.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Cyclades-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Cyclades-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Martin Knoblauch wrote: > On Monday 08 December 2003 13:47, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > Hi Marcelo, > > > 2.4.20-aa included rmap and some VM modifications most notably > > "drop_behind()" logic which I believe should be the reason for the > huge > > read speedups. Can you please try it? Against 2.4.23. > > Just some feedback: > > echo 511 > /proc/sys/vm/max-readahead > > brings back the read performance of my 30 disks on 4 controller > LVM/RAID0. Great.