bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5

bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5

[Paul Mackerras]

Linus,

Could you push your repository to bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5
please?  It is still at 2.5.6-pre2.

Thanks,
Paul.

Re: bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5

[Rik van Riel]

On Sat, 9 Mar 2002, Paul Mackerras wrote:

> Could you push your repository to bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5
> please?  It is still at 2.5.6-pre2.

For now I've put up the 2.5 tree on bk://linuxvm.bkbits.net/linus-2.5

This thing gets mirrored automagically from Linus's home directory
on kernel.org by the script /home/riel/pushpull.sh which is run from
my crontab.

Ideally Linus would run it from his own crontab and commit the data
to bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5 ;)

cheers,

Rik
-- 
<insert bitkeeper endorsement here>

http://www.surriel.com/		http://distro.conectiva.com/

Re: bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5

[Russell King]

On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 11:35:11PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> For now I've put up the 2.5 tree on bk://linuxvm.bkbits.net/linus-2.5

Jeff also does this - http://gkernel.bkbits.net/linus-2.5

Seems a little wasteful to have multiple trees of the same thing available
from the same place.

-- 
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html

Re: bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5

[Jeff Garzik]

Russell King wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 11:35:11PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > For now I've put up the 2.5 tree on bk://linuxvm.bkbits.net/linus-2.5
> 
> Jeff also does this - http://gkernel.bkbits.net/linus-2.5
> 
> Seems a little wasteful to have multiple trees of the same thing available
> from the same place.

Rik thinks that a cron job will somehow notice Linus updates faster than
I do :)

-- 
Jeff Garzik      | Usenet Rule #2 (John Gilmore): "The Net interprets
Building 1024    | censorship as damage and routes around it."
MandrakeSoft     |

Re: bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5

[Rik van Riel]

On Sat, 9 Mar 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Russell King wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 11:35:11PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > For now I've put up the 2.5 tree on bk://linuxvm.bkbits.net/linus-2.5
> >
> > Jeff also does this - http://gkernel.bkbits.net/linus-2.5
> >
> > Seems a little wasteful to have multiple trees of the same thing available
> > from the same place.
>
> Rik thinks that a cron job will somehow notice Linus updates faster than
> I do :)

Not necessarily, but it will notice Linus updates even while
you or I are asleep.  Sleep latency for humans tends to be
quite bad.

regards,

Rik
-- 
<insert bitkeeper endorsement here>

http://www.surriel.com/		http://distro.conectiva.com/

Re: bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5

[Anton Altaparmakov]

At 10:48 09/03/02, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>Russell King wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 11:35:11PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > For now I've put up the 2.5 tree on bk://linuxvm.bkbits.net/linus-2.5
> >
> > Jeff also does this - http://gkernel.bkbits.net/linus-2.5
> >
> > Seems a little wasteful to have multiple trees of the same thing available
> > from the same place.
>
>Rik thinks that a cron job will somehow notice Linus updates faster than
>I do :)

Jeff, even you have to sleep from time to time while the cron job is a true 
somnambulist. (-:

And thanks a lot to both of you for providing us with more uptodate kernel 
bk repositories!

Anton


-- 
   "I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown
-- 
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Linux NTFS Maintainer / WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/
ICQ: 8561279 / WWW: http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/

Re: bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5

[Larry McVoy]

On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 12:33:41PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Linus,
> 
> Could you push your repository to bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5
> please?  It is still at 2.5.6-pre2.

I pushed last night, I had forgotten to automate this and have been doing it
by hand.  Linus is letting me deal with this one because he's unhappy with
the locking model in BK and this serves as a reminder that it needs to be
fixed (or at least that's my theory).
-- 
---
Larry McVoy            	 lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm 

bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5

[James H. Cloos Jr.]

$SUB is not getting updated.  There are over 200 csets in
bk://linus.bkbits.net/linux-2.5 that have not made it over.
         ^
I've not checked whether they show up in the cvs or svn repos.

-JimC

Re: bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5

[Russell King]

On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 11:26:09AM -0400, James H. Cloos Jr. wrote:
> $SUB is not getting updated.  There are over 200 csets in
> bk://linus.bkbits.net/linux-2.5 that have not made it over.
>          ^
> I've not checked whether they show up in the cvs or svn repos.

Try bothering support@bitmover.com rather than lkml - they have the power
to fix the problem unlike lkml.

-- 
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html

Re: bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5

[Larry McVoy]

On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 04:50:28PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 11:26:09AM -0400, James H. Cloos Jr. wrote:
> > $SUB is not getting updated.  There are over 200 csets in
> > bk://linus.bkbits.net/linux-2.5 that have not made it over.
> >          ^
> > I've not checked whether they show up in the cvs or svn repos.
> 
> Try bothering support@bitmover.com rather than lkml - they have the power
> to fix the problem unlike lkml.

I'll sort through these problems when I get back in town tomorrow if they
haven't been fixed by then.  The BK2CVS tree is apparently not getting 
updated either, expect that to be back on line monday.
-- 
---
Larry McVoy              lm at bitmover.com          http://www.bitmover.com/lm