From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 15 May 2002 14:34:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 15 May 2002 14:34:45 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:54290 "HELO garrincha.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 15 May 2002 14:34:45 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 15:33:58 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: William Lee Irwin III cc: Denis Vlasenko , , Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] iowait statistics In-Reply-To: <20020515183004.GG27957@holomorphy.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 15 May 2002, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 10:00:25AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > > Wed May 15 09:58:22 PDT 2002 > > cpu 98583 0 8082 204779 9328 > > > > It looks very constant, not sure if it should be otherwise. > > Not quite constant, just slowly varying: > > Wed May 15 11:30:47 PDT 2002 > cpu 2095183 0 158967 263950 20705 Well, with the amount of memory you have in the machine I expect the time spent in idle and iowait to be fairly limited during a repetitive kernel compile ;) If everything "looks" normal in top and vmstat things should be ok. regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/