From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 20 May 2002 15:25:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 20 May 2002 15:25:01 -0400 Received: from E1-009.ctame700-1.telepar.net.br ([200.181.141.9]:56615 "EHLO orion.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 20 May 2002 15:25:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 16:24:37 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Andrea Arcangeli cc: Andrew Morton , Martin Schwidefsky , , Alan Cox Subject: Re: Bug with shared memory. In-Reply-To: <20020520141523.GB21806@dualathlon.random> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 20 May 2002, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > With memclass_related_bhs() we automatically maximixed the amount of ram > available as inodes/indirects and everything else ZONE_NORMAL, after OK, a question and a remark: 1) does memclass_related_bhs() work if the bufferheads are on another node ? (NUMA-Q) 2) memclass_related_bhs() will definately not work if the data structure is pinned indirectly, say struct address_space which is pinned by mere the existance of the page cache page and cannot easily be freed > > or three, so he may not see your words. > > Ok. We CC'ed Rik so I assume it won't get lost in the mail flood. I'm on holidays, don't expect patches soon :) Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/